Hmmm... almost there, in my opinion, Andrea... I think it could be used in the main jQuery object (singleton), also, to minimize browser dependance, if the user wants to use it with normal Array objects... like:
jQuery.forEach(myArrayObject, , myCallback, myContext); What do you think? This way, the client code can use it both with Array objects and jQuery wrapped DOM objects... Diogo On May 20, 3:35 am, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > JQuery.fn.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach || function(){ ... }; easy? :-) > > On May 20, 2009 3:07 AM, "diogobaeder" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Matt, > > I think your approach is usefull only if one wants to create a new > jQuery method... because checking everytime if forEach method exists > is not easily maintainable... > > Maybe it could be a $.forEach, applying the Mozilla implementation if > the browser doesn't support the method... what do you guys think of > it? > > Diogo > > On May 19, 11:29 am, Matt Kruse <[email protected]> wrote: > On May > 19, 9:19 am, diogobaede... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
