Just used your benchmark and I didn't see any significant differences. Both had slight jumps from time to time, none felt like there was a pattern, I'm using Firefox 3.5 on a iMac pro (last year's edition) running snow leopard.
Michel Belleville 2009/12/4 Jonathan Vanherpe (T & T NV) <jonat...@tnt.be> > Karl Swedberg wrote: > > > On Dec 3, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Dave Methvin wrote: > > I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a > > point, IMHO. > > > It would be great if someone who knew both frameworks could set up a > page that demonstrated a side-by-side case where Mootools has smoother > animations than jQuery. Otherwise it's hard do know what might be > causing the problem, or even whether there's a problem at all. > > > That's a great idea, Dave. > > I wonder how much the easing equation affects people's perception of > "smoothness." It might be worthwhile to try animations using the easing > plugin and see if any of those equations feel smoother. > > --Karl > > ____________ > Karl Swedberg > www.englishrules.com > www.learningjquery.com > > ok, I've used some code I had lying around and put dummy content in > there: > http://www.tnt.be/bugs/jquery/moovsjquery/ > > I actually don't really see a difference on my Ubuntu box (using FF 3.6b4), > but there's a huge difference on a colleague's G4 (OS X 10.4, Firefox > 3.5.5), so try to find a slow computer to test this on. > > Again, this might be the fault of the plugin I'm using, if you have another > way of doing the same thing in jQuery you can tell me so I know for next > time. I really prefer using jQuery, but sometimes I just can't because of > things like this. > > Jonathan > > -- > [image: www.tnt.be] <http://www.tnt.be/?source=emailsig> *Jonathan > Vanherpe* > jonat...@tnt.be - www.tnt.be <http://www.tnt.be/?source=emailsig> - tel.: > +32 (0)9 3860441 >
