No, you need to buy CF Server, however you do not need to buy a Jrun server if you buy CFMX, as it has an OEM version of Jrun with it, but it has lots of limitations (no JSP etc...) its only to run CFMX really.
There is also a CFMX version which runs on top of the Full versions of JRun / Webspere etc. This is called CFMX for J2EE There is a product matrix on the Macromedia site somewhere. Justin > -----Original Message----- > From: Haseltine, Celeste [mailto:CHaseltine@;magticket.com] > Sent: 07 November 2002 16:20 > To: JRun-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX/J2EE > > > Matthew, > > Did I understand your last statement correctly, that CF can now > run on JRUN > 4.0, without having to purchase the CF server? I thought you needed both > servers. This would be of great interest to me if my above statement is > correct, as the CF server can run upwards of $2500, where as JRUN > 4.0 is now > $499.00 for the full upgrade (including EJB server). > > If I understood you correctly, the business reasons for consider CF on the > front end are faster development time (for the front end), and lower costs > for the hiring of front end development staff. One of my BIGGEST problems > is convincing the MBA types, who have NO understanding of the > technical side > of a project, that taking an HTML coder who has little of no knowledge of > actual programming but is willing to work at $18.00/hr, and throwing him > into JSP development is often detrimental to the project's timeline and > overall cost long term, no matter what their initial data may show. It > sounds like CF developers may have more experience in actual > coding, and as > such, could make the transition to JSP development, or a combination of > JSP/CF front end development much easier. And not blow the > project timeline > or budget. > > Thanks for your input!! You've given me some things to think about and > research further. > > Celeste > -----Original Message----- > >From: Matthew Horn [mailto:mhorn@;macromedia.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:10 AM > To: JRun-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX/J2EE > > > I don't use CF either, but I think I can answer some of your questions. > > CF is a RAD environment including a nice administration console > and a huge, > easy-to-use tag library. CF tags pre-date JSPs and tag libraries, and as a > result are more robust and fleshed out because they have been in > development > for 7 years or so. In many people's opinions, the CF tag set is > much simpler > to use than JSTL or any of the other tag libraries on J2EE. CF also has a > lot of other nice time-tested extras that you don't get from > free-ware. The > emphasis is on making complex tasks easy to do in a short time. > > Why is CF now on J2EE? Previous releases of CF ran only on a CF server and > were therefor limited to the platforms that CF supported. In > addition, they > were not as extensible as other "open-standards" environments. The most > recent release of CF runs on the major J2EE servers (or as a > standalone with > it's own server -- JRun). The server environment is as extensible > as Java is > now; you can use all the J2EE goodies (like Struts, JSF, JDOM, > ..., and are > not tied into a single vendor for the future. > > I am sure there are others with more experience that can give you more > details. > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Haseltine, Celeste [mailto:CHaseltine@;magticket.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:31 AM > To: JRun-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX/J2EE > > > Drew, > > I'm not a CF developer, nor am I very familiar with CF, other than knowing > that it is a proprietary tag language based on Java/JSP/Servlets. I'm a > J2EE/C++ developer and software architect. But I am curious as to the > business reasons why I would want to develop an application using both CF > and J2EE, inclusive of EJB's. Why not do the whole thing in J2EE > using many > of the "free" tag libraries that are available? I've seen more > of this type > of approach being covered in discussion threads out on the web, > but they are > technical discussions only. Is there a business reason (i.e. cost savings > in development time/manpower/salary, savings in maintenance over life of > product, etc) for taking such an approach that you have seen/experienced? > As an architect, I have to take both the business and the > technical reasons > into consideration when designing a new project and coming up with the > Project Schedule/budget/manpower forcasts. > > Thanks in advance for any comments/past experiences that you can share. > > Celeste Haseltine, PE > MTL, Inc > Dallas, TX > > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Drew Falkman [mailto:drew@;drewfalkman.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:02 PM > To: JRun-Talk > Subject: CFMX/J2EE > > > Hey all- > > I just wanted to let you all know that our new book on CFMX/J2EE > integration > is out. It is part of Ben Forta's Reality ColdFusion series, so includes 5 > different application and goes through the process of creating each - > allowing the reader to understand the process behind the > application and why > we used J2EE where we did. Plus you get 5 fully functional apps: a portal, > CRM app, B2B exchange, e-commerce (with EJBs) and an XML content > syndication > engine. > > If you are interested go to http://www.forta.com/books/0321129482/ or > contact me directly. > > Hope all is going well with everyone. > > Thanks, > > Drew Falkman > Veraison, LLC > http://www.drewfalkman.com > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=8 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=8 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
