Again, saving characters vs. saving entire lines of code... I will guarantee
90% of applications written in CF will take less LOCs than any J2EE
application.

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:macarthy@;iol.ie]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:10 AM
To: JRun-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX/J2EE


You don't need type-ing to do

init (name)
{
        init(name,0);
}

init (name, age )
{ }

speaking of init, thats another annoying thing, no default constructors , or
Destructors...

Ok this is way OT :-)

Justin

> > The current version of CF has new features that any oo developers will
> > recognize, components, inheritance etc. It occupies a space somewhere
> > between a scripting language and a programming language. This has it's
> > advantages and disadvantages. OO developers might be frustrated by the
> > missing OO features of CF (example: no overloading functions Ahhh!)
>
> You are asking too much, overloading on a typeless language problably
> doesn't make sense after all
>
>
>
> > some of the language quirks (example: no i++, only i = i + 1; a IS b,
> > instead of a == b or a===b etc.)
>
> Very true :-(((
>
> Massimo
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=8
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=8
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Reply via email to