It's not appropriate name just check this out: http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&fkt=15311&fsdt=15898&q=Aardvark&aqi=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > Apache Aardvark: self-contained armored creature. > > Craig > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote: > >> Oh yeah - and ideally it would sound good by itself or with Apache in >> front of it. >> >> >> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Jeremy Haile wrote: >> >>> To follow up with that, my ideal name would: >>> >>> a) Mean something intuitively in English (something that implies >>> lock-solid, secure, impenetrable, etc.) >>> >>> b) Be easy to spell, even if you've just heard someone say the name out >>> loud >>> >>> c) Not conflict with existing projects or trademarks >>> >>> Too bad names like that are hard to come up with... >>> >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Jeremy Haile wrote: >>> >>>> My problems with AplSec are: >>>> >>>> a) Doesn't intuitively mean much (e.g. "Apple Sec? Is this something for >>>> the iPhone or Macs?") >>>> >>>> b) Hard to spell when you hear it out loud. (e.g. Most people would >>>> probably type "apple sec" into google) >>>> >>>> c) Sort of confusingly close to the name TripleSec, also an Apache >>>> security project - is that bad or good? >>>> >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok. I think I got it. Something that makes sense, kinda rolls off the >>>>> tongue, has good alphabetical ordering, and allows a broad umbrella of >>>>> functionality, and based off of english words that directly correspond >>>>> to >>>>> our feature set: >>>>> >>>>> Apache Aplsec >>>>> >>>>> Prounounced like "Apple Sec", similar to the pronunciation of the >>>>> liqueur, >>>>> Triplesec. APLlication SECurity. >>>>> >>>>> Although Shiro seemed somewhat agreeable, it is kind of a correlation >>>>> leap >>>>> to come back to security - no easy tie-in or obvious recognition to >>>>> application security. >>>>> >>>>> There are also NO results for a full US Trademark and Name Search (all >>>>> fields, either live or dead records). No products or projects with >>>>> that >>>>> name that I can find. >>>>> >>>>> Also, I guess one benefit of having a name without the 'J' at the front >>>>> is >>>>> that we can (if the project team so chooses) start to support other >>>>> languages, like ActionScript for Flash/Flex applications, or C# for >>>>> windows >>>>> apps, etc. Just a thought. It may never come in to play, but hey - >>>>> I'm >>>>> brainstorming... >>>>> >>>>> Whaddya think? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Les Hazlewood >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a part of the incubation process : >>>>>>> "Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and >>>>>>> check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already >>>>>>> trademarked for an existing software product." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> How do we use this service? Does ASF have a login? It doesn't appear >>>>>> to >>>>>> be a free service, but I wouldn't know - it looks very convoluted and >>>>>> not >>>>>> copacetic to performing ad-hoc searches. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >
