Hahaha
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:47:37 -0500, "Moin Ayazifar" <[email protected]> said: > It's not appropriate name just check this out: > http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&fkt=15311&fsdt=15898&q=Aardvark&aqi=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Apache Aardvark: self-contained armored creature. > > > > Craig > > > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote: > > > >> Oh yeah - and ideally it would sound good by itself or with Apache in > >> front of it. > >> > >> > >> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Jeremy Haile wrote: > >> > >>> To follow up with that, my ideal name would: > >>> > >>> a) Mean something intuitively in English (something that implies > >>> lock-solid, secure, impenetrable, etc.) > >>> > >>> b) Be easy to spell, even if you've just heard someone say the name out > >>> loud > >>> > >>> c) Not conflict with existing projects or trademarks > >>> > >>> Too bad names like that are hard to come up with... > >>> > >>> > >>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Jeremy Haile wrote: > >>> > >>>> My problems with AplSec are: > >>>> > >>>> a) Doesn't intuitively mean much (e.g. "Apple Sec? Is this something for > >>>> the iPhone or Macs?") > >>>> > >>>> b) Hard to spell when you hear it out loud. (e.g. Most people would > >>>> probably type "apple sec" into google) > >>>> > >>>> c) Sort of confusingly close to the name TripleSec, also an Apache > >>>> security project - is that bad or good? > >>>> > >>>> Jeremy > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Ok. I think I got it. Something that makes sense, kinda rolls off the > >>>>> tongue, has good alphabetical ordering, and allows a broad umbrella of > >>>>> functionality, and based off of english words that directly correspond > >>>>> to > >>>>> our feature set: > >>>>> > >>>>> Apache Aplsec > >>>>> > >>>>> Prounounced like "Apple Sec", similar to the pronunciation of the > >>>>> liqueur, > >>>>> Triplesec. APLlication SECurity. > >>>>> > >>>>> Although Shiro seemed somewhat agreeable, it is kind of a correlation > >>>>> leap > >>>>> to come back to security - no easy tie-in or obvious recognition to > >>>>> application security. > >>>>> > >>>>> There are also NO results for a full US Trademark and Name Search (all > >>>>> fields, either live or dead records). No products or projects with > >>>>> that > >>>>> name that I can find. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, I guess one benefit of having a name without the 'J' at the front > >>>>> is > >>>>> that we can (if the project team so chooses) start to support other > >>>>> languages, like ActionScript for Flash/Flex applications, or C# for > >>>>> windows > >>>>> apps, etc. Just a thought. It may never come in to play, but hey - > >>>>> I'm > >>>>> brainstorming... > >>>>> > >>>>> Whaddya think? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Les Hazlewood > >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This is a part of the incubation process : > >>>>>>> "Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and > >>>>>>> check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already > >>>>>>> trademarked for an existing software product." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> How do we use this service? Does ASF have a login? It doesn't appear > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> be a free service, but I wouldn't know - it looks very convoluted and > >>>>>> not > >>>>>> copacetic to performing ad-hoc searches. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > Craig L Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > >
