Sorry - I missed the reply. The two items are:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. " and "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. " Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official Apache release? Hen On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]> wrote: > Henri, > > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project . > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and to me > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order. > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time. > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here. > > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done, that > could help I think. > > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and can we > close them ? > > kind regards, > Harry > > > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <[email protected]> > >> Great to hear :) >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then? >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR. >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)? >> >> Hen >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Henri, >> > >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that there has >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There have been >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not Apache >> branded >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group has >> never >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release". >> > >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated. >> > >> > Craig >> > >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> > >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might be >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into the >> >> code. >> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's needed >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP? >> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. " >> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. " >> >> >> >> Are these still open? >> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9 JIRA >> >> issues: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC >> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers: >> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636) >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461) >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538) >> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the Apache >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating new >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them. >> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of this. >> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this, >> >> >> >> Hen >> > >> > Craig L Russell >> > Architect, Oracle >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > >> > >> >
