a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing

<http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ?

Harry


2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <[email protected]>

> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
> JSPWIKI-545.
>
> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
> sign CLAs.
>
> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
>
> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Henri,
> >
> > we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
> > issues)
> >
> > I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
> > that is finished as noted in:
> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
> >
> > regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Sorry - I missed the reply.
> >>
> >> The two items are:
> >>
> >> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> >> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
> >> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
> >> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >>
> >> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
> >> Apache release?
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Henri,
> >> >
> >> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
> >> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and
> to
> >> me
> >> > itÅ› unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
> >> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
> >> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
> >> >
> >> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
> that
> >> > could help I think.
> >> >
> >> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and
> can
> >> we
> >> > close them ?
> >> >
> >> > kind regards,
> >> > Harry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >> Great to hear :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
> >> >>
> >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
> >> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
> >> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
> >> >>
> >> >> Hen
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Henri,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
> there
> >> has
> >> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
> have
> >> been
> >> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
> Apache
> >> >> branded
> >> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group
> has
> >> >> never
> >> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Craig
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might
> be
> >> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
> >> the
> >> >> >> code.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
> needed
> >> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
> the
> >> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project.
> "
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
> >> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
> right
> >> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Are these still open?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
> >> JIRA
> >> >> >> issues:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
> >> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
> >> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
> Apache
> >> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating
> new
> >> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
> >> this.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hen
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Craig L Russell
> >> >> > Architect, Oracle
> >> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
> >> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to