Looks good. So just Alain listed as without a CLA? Any history on the attempt to contact him?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]> wrote: > a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page : > http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing > > <http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ? > > Harry > > > 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <[email protected]> > >> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set >> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to >> JSPWIKI-545. >> >> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any >> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to >> sign CLAs. >> >> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have >> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question >> remaining is who the inactive committers were. >> >> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer >> community wise before it moved to the Incubator. >> >> Hen >> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Henri, >> > >> > we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open >> > issues) >> > >> > I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think >> > that is finished as noted in: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589 >> > >> > regards, >> > Harry >> > >> > >> > 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <[email protected]> >> > >> >> Sorry - I missed the reply. >> >> >> >> The two items are: >> >> >> >> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF >> >> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. " >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution >> >> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine >> >> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. " >> >> >> >> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official >> >> Apache release? >> >> >> >> Hen >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Henri, >> >> > >> >> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project . >> >> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and >> to >> >> me >> >> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order. >> >> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time. >> >> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here. >> >> > >> >> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done, >> that >> >> > could help I think. >> >> > >> >> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and >> can >> >> we >> >> > close them ? >> >> > >> >> > kind regards, >> >> > Harry >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <[email protected]> >> >> > >> >> >> Great to hear :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then? >> >> >> >> >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion >> >> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move >> >> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR. >> >> >> >> >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)? >> >> >> >> >> >> Hen >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi Henri, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that >> there >> >> has >> >> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There >> have >> >> been >> >> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not >> Apache >> >> >> branded >> >> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group >> has >> >> >> never >> >> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release". >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Craig >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might >> be >> >> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into >> >> the >> >> >> >> code. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's >> needed >> >> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to >> the >> >> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the >> >> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. >> " >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the >> >> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the >> right >> >> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. " >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these still open? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9 >> >> JIRA >> >> >> >> issues: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636) >> >> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461) >> >> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the >> Apache >> >> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating >> new >> >> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of >> >> this. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hen >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Craig L Russell >> >> >> > Architect, Oracle >> >> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo >> >> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >
