Hi, I've been able to run "ant signeddist" without any problems. I've also checked svn status on the new tag, just to ensure that I didn't left any files behind a while ago, and there aren't neither modified nor pending files :-?
Googlin a bit on the stacktrace, and it might seem that either port 9001 (hsqldb default port) was up before running the tests or hsqldb jar is missing/unreadable (they seem to me weird causes, though). Is someone else reproducing this error? regards, juan pablo On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Janne Jalkanen <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com>wrote: > > Trying to run "ant signeddist" gives me > > db-setup: > [echo] Setting up the database tables. > > BUILD FAILED > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:317: The following error > occurred while executing this line: > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1389: The following error > occurred while executing this line: > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1420: java.sql.SQLException: > Connection is broken > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source) > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcConnection.<init>(Unknown Source) > at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.getConnection(Unknown Source) > at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.connect(Unknown Source) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JDBCTask.getConnection(JDBCTask.java:370) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.getConnection(SQLExec.java:942) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.execute(SQLExec.java:614) > > > Is it just me and my config or is this happening for everyone? > > (Freshly checked out from repo.) > > /Janne > > On May 26, 2012, at 13:46 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > > > done, > > > > just moved tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_rc1 and created a new > > rc tag at > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 > > > > > > br, > > juan pablo > > > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Janne (and all) > >> > >> apologies on no following up on this. I've had a lot of work at job the > >> last few weeks, so I've been unable to do pretty much anything :-s I'll > >> create the tag this weekend > >> > >> > >> regards & thx for looking at this, > >> juan pablo > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Janne Jalkanen < > janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Well, can you just create the tag and let me know which tag to build > and > >>> sign? > >>> > >>> /Janne > >>> > >>> On May 9, 2012, at 23:11 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> now that I did have a while to check current tag, Janne I think I've > >>>> misspoke about the tag contents. I was intending that the new tag > >>> contained > >>>> the build.xml fix plus JSPWIKI-683... My apologies on not having > >>> explained > >>>> myself properly :-S > >>>> > >>>> So, as for now, we have two options: > >>>> a.- vote on current tag (2.9.0-incubating-0), no need of generating > new > >>>> artifacts. > >>>> b.- generate a new tag (can do it myself) with JSPWIKI-683. If we go > >>>> through this option, we could also add the fix for JSPWIKI-728 and > call > >>> a > >>>> vote on 2.9.0-incubating-2. > >>>> > >>>> Option b.- would mean generating new artifacts. It's not like they are > >>>> mandatory in order to run the vote, we vote on a tag and the artifacts > >>> are > >>>> there for convenience; however, if the vote succeeds, which seems to > me > >>>> likely to happen, we will have to generate them anyway. > >>>> > >>>> WDYT? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> juan pablo > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Janne Jalkanen < > >>> janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The new signed artifacts are at > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/. > >>>>> > >>>>> /Janne > >>>>> > >>>>> On May 4, 2012, at 20:34 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm sending the email withdrawing the vote right now. Janne, can you > >>>>> push a > >>>>>> new tag + rc? thanks in advance! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> br, > >>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > >>>>>> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> So this seems (sort of) lazy consensus towards rolling + voting on > >>>>> another > >>>>>>> rc. I'll withdraw the ongoing vote in 60 minutes from now, so > anyone > >>>>>>> feeling that the vote should continue can express it before closing > >>> it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Harry Metske < > harry.met...@gmail.com > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2012/5/3 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think that (someone please correct me if I'm mistaken) would > >>> imply > >>>>>>>>> withdrawing the current vote, roll a new RC and restart the vote > on > >>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> new RC. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If this is ok with all, then we should: > >>>>>>>>> 1.- svn rename tag 2.9.0 to 2.9.0-rc-0 > >>>>>>>>> 2.- make a new 2.9.0 tag from trunk (2.9.0-incubating-2?), so > >>>>>>>> JSPWIKI-683 > >>>>>>>>> gets included as well, with the required changes on build.xml > >>>>>>>>> 3.- recast the vote stating that this is the 2nd rc of 2.9.0 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I would go +0.1 on this procedure [1], so, anyone else, what do > you > >>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> rgrds, > >>>>>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Janne Jalkanen < > >>>>>>>> janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Oops, that's my bad. Yes, you need to manually change the > >>> build.xml > >>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> this particular tag. Shall we reroll the artifacts and the tag? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> /Janne > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 3 May 2012, at 01:36, Florian Holeczek wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> during my checks, I wasn't able to reproduce the source zip > file > >>>>>>>> due to > >>>>>>>>>> one single point. > >>>>>>>>>>> Could you please check whether the correct build.xml gets > >>> included > >>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>> your environments? Over here, it seems to always include the one > >>> from > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> trunk, although I made svn.tag = tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>>> Florian > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <juanpa...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 13:05:30 > >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> This is an incubator release for Apache JSPWiki, version > >>>>>>>>>> 2.9.0-incubating. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It fixes the following issues: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by 72 hours from now. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are > >>> provided > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> convenience. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary files: > >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0/ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > >>> release: > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
