|
Hmmm, sounds like an I-D 10-T problem
here...
The Mission of TechEngage was to retrain persons in
order to allow them to get jobs, it wasn't meant to amuse Java folks (or
Microsoft folks or SAS folks...). There was a clear goal in mind.
Part of that process was to then allow persons with
this training to use it in volunteer work. That has yet to pan out.
So, I never said that $145 was supposed to do that,
I did say that the the objectives were not met and the cost was not more than
reasonable for what you got, but for what the intent of the mission was it was
not working, so in terms of the objectives, the cost did not match the end
result.
So, let's stop being so parochial about this and
understand that people who know object oriented languages and folks who have
long time skills in software development using ANY language can learn "yet
another language" and do the job as long as the language snobbery ("But you
don't have 5 years in "my" language of choice") doesn't get in the way. But it
does. It does big time, so no learning even at $5 or $2500 per week
will help as long as that attitude is in place.
And let's also face it, look in the mirror, most of
us are no longer 30-something. Companies are using "not my language" arguments
also as a way to age discriminate, but that is a discussion for another
time.
The planet I am from is the reality planet, you use
an educational program to better your chances of employment. In this strict
sense, TechEngage has failed. In the sense of self improvement it has
not.
Thank you for your time, and I'll return you to
your current program.
|
_______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
