On 09/12/16 06:32, John Meinel wrote: > > 1. "charm push cs:~jameinel/ubuntu-lite" fails ultimately with a TLS > timeout error: > ERROR cannot post archive: Post > https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/~jameinel/ubuntu-lite/archive?.. > > <https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/%7Ejameinel/ubuntu-lite/archive?..>.: > net/http: TLS handshake timeout > I thought the point of multi-series charms is that you didn't have > to publish to an explicit series. >
You should be validated that there are *some* relevant series, with one as the default. > 1. The result of a successful push tells you "unpublished". But the > command to actually publish one is "charm release". Should we be > using the verbiage of "unreleased"? Certainly there was no > indication of what I should be doing to get the charm to a > 'published' state from the CLI. > Yes, that makes sense, the feedback should use the 'release' term and should tell you how to make that happen. It should also be possible to have the push command also --release [channels] > 1. ubuntu-lite does get from "pending" to "active" a fair bit faster > than the full 'ubuntu' charm (about 1-2 minutes on my LXD provider.) > Sounds like we can make reactive a little leaner. Mark
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
