Thank you for offering to help. I would like to phase out SymPy, but I don't see it happening in the foreseeable future. I'm not sure how to quantify the amount of capability in SymPy, but it is more or less "enormous". I think I could work 8 hours a day for a year and not duplicate it in Julia. At the moment, I'm able to invest zero hours per day, but I hope that will change in the summer. More important now is phasing SymPy in: Translating the two AST's works quite well, but it is not complete. But, there is a lot of stuff to work on that is not in SymPy, like improving pattern matching. .... If one were serious about removing the SymPy dependency, the best thing to do would be to work on improving the SymPy interface because this is the fastest way to make SJulia useful, which would attract users, and therefore developers.
--John El lunes, 20 de abril de 2015, 16:42:02 (UTC+2), Marcus Appelros escribió: > > Awesome! Do you have plans to eventually phase out the SymPy dependency? > We can collaborate on that! > > On Monday, 20 April 2015 15:16:08 UTC+3, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Here is SJulia >> >> https://github.com/jlapeyre/SJulia >> >>
