Colin, Correct, that was a typo. Juno and jewel are working well for me with 0.4 and I wasn't aware M Innes would be switching to Atom. I still haven't been able to get Atom to work well with Julia; I get the same depreciation warnings as you, but I also get some errors that prevent compilation in editor. Maybe in time, we'll get it straightened out. I currently think it's just a simple communication error between Atom and the REPL but I haven't played with them much.
Thanks! /R On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 6:30:09 PM UTC-4, Colin Bowers wrote: > > I've not heard of lightbox. Do you mean LightTable? I used to use > LightTable with Mike Innes Juno package, but made the switch to Atom > because my understanding is that from v0.4 onwards, Mike will be > concentrating his efforts there. To be honest, I'm really happy with Atom > and the Julia packages. I think Mike has already got it as friendly and > feature-rich as Juno was (as long as you're on the Master branch of the > packages, that is). And the deprecation warnings are not a deal-breaker - > more a minor inconvenience. > > Cheers, > > Colin > > On 29 October 2015 at 03:45, endowdly <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Have you tried using lightbox? >> >> I ran into similar problems with atom, which I prefer due to speed. I >> could get lightbox to play well with the repl, however and "using jewel". >> >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:03:15 PM UTC-4, [email protected] >> wrote: >>> >>> Done. Precompilation occurred at the REPL, and I didn't have to do it >>> within Atom. Verified packages are all on Master. Unfortunately, I'm still >>> getting all of the original deprecation warnings when evaluating from the >>> editor in Atom. >>> >>> I'm happy to pursue this further, but am equally happy to wait it out if >>> you're running short on ideas or time. >>> >>> Cheers and thanks, >>> >>> Colin >>> >>> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 12:24:38 UTC+11, Spencer Russell wrote: >>>> >>>> You’re running into another known issue: >>>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/12941 >>>> >>>> Try opening a normal REPL in the terminal and run “using Atom” to >>>> trigger the precompilation, then it shouldn’t need to happen when you run >>>> from Atom. >>>> >>>> -s >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 27, 2015, at 9:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> Ah... understood. Many thanks. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I'm still not getting the desired result however. After >>>> running checkout on "Atom", "CodeTools" and "JuliaParser" I run >>>> Pkg.status() and can verify I'm on the master branch for all 3. So I fire >>>> up Atom again, try to evaluate in the editor, and get the following error: >>>> >>>> INFO: Recompiling stale cache file >>>> /home/colin/.julia/lib/v0.4/JuliaParser.ji >>>> Julia has stopped: 1, null >>>> >>>> So I close down Atom, open it again, and try to evaluate in the editor >>>> again. This time I get: >>>> >>>> INFO: Recompiling stale cache file >>>> /home/colin/.julia/lib/v0.4/CodeTools.ji >>>> Julia has stopped: 1, null >>>> >>>> Close down Atom one more time, re-open it and try again. Now I get: >>>> >>>> INFO: Recompiling stale cache file /home/colin/.julia/lib/v0.4/Atom.ji >>>> >>>> but everything is now working fine. Problem solved? Unfortunately not. >>>> I restart Atom again and I'm back to all the deprecation warnings, even >>>> though Pkg.status() indicates I'm still on the master branch for Atom, >>>> CodeTools, and JuliaParser. >>>> >>>> Apologies for the long message. Also, if this is one of those things >>>> that will resolve itself over the next couple of weeks as changes from >>>> master are pushed to the more stable branches, then I'm happy to ignore >>>> the >>>> warnings for the time being and not waste anyone's time any further with >>>> what is essentially a minor inconvenience. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Colin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 11:37:21 UTC+11, Spencer Russell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> `Pkg.checkout(…)` operates an an already-installed package, so it must >>>>> be run after `Pkg.add(…)`. >>>>> >>>>> -s >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 27, 2015, at 8:31 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I suppose I could clone the master branch. Is that a bad idea? >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 11:30:43 UTC+11, [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for responding. >>>>>> >>>>>> Pkg.checkout("Atom") gives me the error: >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: Atom is not a git repo >>>>>> in checkout at pkg/entry.jl:203 >>>>>> in anonymous at pkg/dir.jl:31 >>>>>> in cd at file.jl:22 >>>>>> in cd at pkg/dir.jl:31 >>>>>> in checkout at pkg.jl:37 >>>>>> >>>>>> (I originally did try using Pkg.checkout as per the instructions, but >>>>>> got this error, and so went with Pkg.add instead). >>>>>> >>>>>> Any thoughts or is this a bug? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Colin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 11:23:30 UTC+11, Jonathan Malmaud wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You want to be on the master versions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pkg.checkout("Atom") >>>>>>> Pkg.checkout("CodeTools") >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >
