note: i am not sure if i shall send this message to the user list too
==========================

Dear Developer and User of OpenJUMP,

yesterday evening we (7 people) had an IRC talk on the future of 
OpenJUMP and JPP.
The reason has been that Erwan Bocher is involved in a larger 3 year 
project on building a SDI (Spatial Data Infrastructure) probably based 
on OpenJUMP. He and his team offer us to participate on the developments 
they want to do. The project will cover 2 subproject concerning the 
improvement but also a refactoring of the current OpenJUMP code.

a) Implementing an abstract database layer based on H2 database 
(http://www.h2database.com/). This will solve some memory problems and 
give an abstract interface (e.g. shp or gml driver independent) for 
plugin development.

b) They plan to implement map algebra functionality for raster data 
(images). The raster functionalities will be based on ImageJ 
(http://www.cooa.unh.edu/tutorial.jsp) and deegree libraries 
(http://deegree.sourceforge.net/)

Out of the discussion yesterday and today in a personal talk with Erwan 
we realized that the project (from Erwan), but also other people like 
me, have (1) other needs for functionality than Desktop GIS end-users. 
(2) Furthermore, in response to the FOSSGIS in Berlin, we see a need for 
a legal entity for organizing workshops and receiving money for 
particular developments.

*) The proposal we have now, is that JPP would focus on end-user 
developments. The OpenJUMP enduser version will still be hosted on 
Sourceforge (probably under the JPP umbrella). Further we will establish 
a second OpenJUMP Reserach Version (which will obtain later a different 
name), on that Erwans team can work on and will be a GIS platform for 
research.
Here it is not yet clear where this project will be hosted (several 
proposal have been made: Intevation, SourceForge or IRSTV institute 
(http://www.irstv.cnrs.fr/) .. thereby I do prefer a sourceforge account).

It is intended that for endusers useful functionality will be merged 
into the original OpenJUMP (which needs of course people to do that).

*) With respect to the legal entity: Erwan offered to give SIGLE, which 
is already one, a sligthly different objective than currently. This 
means SIGLE should renamend (eventually to OpenJUMP Research Consortium) 
and interantionalized (not only to the european scale) to be able to 
organize development and teaching on OpenJUMP and OpenJUMP-R.

A personal final comment: We need to re-think who will drive JPP and 
what and who is JPP? I will be rather commited to the research version, 
  for the case of staying on a university by autumn this year.

so far to our ideas and the discussion is opened.

stefan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to