Hi all,

at the end its Intevations decision, which based on their company 
policy. And if we can't keep going with the builds on their 
infrastructure I am thankful to Intevation, in particular Sascha and 
Stephan for their support over the past years.
If there is no more to say from Intevation after Edgars last email, then 
we@OJ will have to decide what we do and get back to you then.

@JPPDevels
Yes Stephan is right, when we did setup the whole Nightly Build process 
some time ago - we/I agreed that ecw will not be included and instead we 
used/added the dummy class.

On the other hand - I am not seeing a need to have ecw included in the 
(daily) nightly build. If it the dlls are removed from there and later 
added again for a regular release version, then I am fine with that = my 
2 cents.

cheers from the west of Canada
stefan


On 06/10/2011 10:20 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> On 06.10.2011 17:25, Stephan Holl wrote:
>> Yes, since the ECW-binaries are included in the builds now (since
>> r2425 and r2442) we cannot distribute them with the binaries included
>> anymore.
> by that you mean, you do not want to i guess. could you please elaborate why?
>
>> This is not allowed by the GPL!
> the current usage of ecw code (with available&  modifiable sources btw.) 
> should fall under
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
>
> ecw code not at all calls anything in oj. so this plugin is not based on 
> gpl'd oj code. the java binding btw. is gpl'd by gvsig, the authors.
>
>> So if the OpenJump-community wants this included (which is not allowed)
>> we will stop supporting the the nightly builds from our side.
>>
>> Sorry about that.
> ok, so we might have to reconsider if we externalize the binaries once again, 
> the ecw 3.3 license as far as i see allows that.
>
>> It was clearly communicated with Stefan Steiniger to have the nightlies
>> without any proprietary codes in it.
> sorry, but i have never heard of this agreement, and although i understand 
> what you want, i still don't understand why you insist on it. the ecw sdk 3.3 
> license clearly allows a usage as we do now. the gpl is fine with a plugin 
> usage as well.
>
> thanks ede
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to