To avoid forking the code further, we could just make a new Configuration file and a new build file. I think ME applications have to be built with NetBeans.
We need a name. I think we can avoid "Jump ME" for the obvious reason. Something like MiniJUMP, or MobileJUMP, or (more obscure) Demitasse. regards, Larry On 10/3/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mhm.. > > after Arnd outlines the "use cases" i would rather say that a skilled > programmer (which I am not) can do this things in about 4 weeks > (fulltime). It is basically restructuring the GUI (workbench) as most of > the desired functionality is available from existing plugins. > my guess > > stefan > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > > >OpenJUMP on Java ME sounds cool, but I agree with Larry...it sounds > >like a pretty monster task. > > > >Still, a lot of OpenJUMP's functionality is added to the core as a > >plug-in in the JUMPConfiguration class. I suppose someone could start > >by unplugging things there. > > > >The Sunburned Surveyor > > > >On 10/2/07, Hisaji ONO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Thank you for response. > >> > >> By the way, can JTS be built on latest Java ME > >>environment? > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>jump-users mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > >> > >> > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >jump-users mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jump-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > -- http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ jump-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
