On 04/13/2018 02:30 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, [email protected] wrote: > >> Id even like to do cgnat for up to 5000 users but not sure if a >> single box setup would be wise. > > I'm curious why you and other service providers are interested in > CGNAT when IPv4 addresses are still relatively cheap to buy. In many > cases, even the hard costs of CGNAT are less thant what the needed > IPv4 addresses cost, let alone the large operational costs of > supporting users behind NATS, so I'm guessing your motivations aren't > about cost, is that right? > Cheap... hmm... $5 - $10/each is not cheap, but at that level, nat is like printing money. Now, if someone had a /20 for closer to $1/ea, maybe... but what I know of that market is, forget it.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
