https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203042
--- Comment #15 from Huon <h...@plonq.org> --- (In reply to Henrik Fehlauer from comment #13) > Quick feedback: > - Image count in fullscreen looks great. Only the linebreaks for long > filenames look a bit odd, we should not regress on that. Thanks for the feedback, I'll investigate that line break. > Will need lots of testing, also with all of the configuration options this > toolbar provides. With the thumbnail bar turned off, the counter sticks to the far right, leaving lots of room for the filename. More important is the (default) mode as in the screenshots given it's a bit cramped. > One idea would be to anchor the filename top-left, and the counter > bottom-right for the multi-line case. > - There are already lots of items in the window title, no need to add on top > of that. Might be tricky but I'll look into it. > - It might also be worth thinking about Browse mode at the same time to > provide a consistent experience (wording, content, positioning). Also thought about this, but since we can multi-select, it might be confusing if we're still displaying "5 of 13" based on the current URL (in the context manager). Hence why I left it as is for now. > In View mode, there are some issues (which your screenshot does not show, > because it does not show the full window and not the default window size ;) > > See https://phabricator.kde.org/D8306 for some screenshots where it is very > clear that there is absolutely no more space we can fit anything in. On the > contrary, we might have to think about removing or rearranging things, to > get the minimum window width down again. Next, a user interface, i.e. the > status bar in our case, becomes less usable once we cram too many items in > and the information and button density becomes too high. > > I thought about displaying the image count somewhere else, e.g. in the > toolbar, in the sidepanel or as an overlay. However, all of those options > are not very appealing. What we could do here is to only display the label > if there is enough space, i.e. based on the width of the label plus a > (generous!) amount of whitespace on both sides. To improve grouping, I'd > probably also prefer centering the label. Perhaps putting the zoom modes in the toolbar is the answer. They'd fit right in next to other buttons that affect the current image, like rotating. If we moved the document count out of the status bar, we'd also need to move it for Browse mode. IMO the status bar is the best place for it, that's where users expect it to be (see: file managers). > @Nate: Do you think we need "Document 1 of 2", or is "1 of 2" or "1/2" > (which is what the old Gwenview showed) good enough? For example in Okular's > page counter (which is a bit different, but relevant nevertheless) it says > "1 of 2". > (Also, we might need to rethink the "Document" wording, because Okular is > the document viewer which can view images too, but Gwenview is an image > viewer which can view document-like images…) If we go with "1 of 50", and get rid of "document" (which I agree is confusing), what do we do in Browse? The wording needs to include images and videos, but not folders, archives, etc. "Items" is a bit too ambiguous. "Media items"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
