On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 23:07:56 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:41:07 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > ... > > > As Martin said very well already: By defining our goals not in terms of > > technology but in terms of values and principles, we don't lose the > > technology aspect, we are still experts in Qt, > > sure we'll lose it long-term. > If we don't focus at all on Qt,
Nobody says that we don't focus at all on Qt. Our software is built around Qt, and nobody wants to change that. It's because Qt is an excellent solution to many of our problems, it just isn't a goal in itself, but a tool. > won't KDE become a mixture of projects > using many different technologies ? This is how I understand the goal of > this draft. If that's so, then Qt will only be one among many in KDE, not > KDEs main competence anymore. -- sebas Sebastian Kügler | http://vizZzion.org | http://kde.org _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
