On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:37:09PM +0200, Martin Flöser wrote: > Let's just remove it and separate into applications released as part > of a larger bundle for release simplification and applications > having their own release cycle.
That's what I've written, they're all the same just different details in release. https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft I include Calligra, Krita, KDevelop and Amarok in the Self Released category. Maybe that'll get changed in repo-metadata but it's hardly important. > With extragear gone I don't really see the need of playground any > more. Playground applications are just like all the other things, > except that they did not go through KDE Review. Which brings me to > the next point: remove the review. If the review can be automated that would be great but so far that's not the case and issues are frequently brought up. As a packager I often come across the same issues as kdereview should because, as pointed out, we only do a 1 off review, but it's nicer to have that 1 off than nothing while there's no automation. I didn't include krazy/ebn in the sanity checklist because I never got an answer on how relevant it is to the process. As others have said it's more about project infrastructure being sane rather than code being high quality. https://community.kde.org/ReleasingExtragearSoftware#Sanity_Checklist Jonathan
