Am 17. Juli 2017 18:19:43 MESZ schrieb Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]>: >On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:01:39PM +0200, Martin Flöser wrote: >> Am 2017-07-17 17:47, schrieb Jonathan Riddell: >> >I propose to make this final if there's no further comments. >> >> as I explained: I think the review process should be removed, >> playground should be removed. >> >> There were both people supporting the idea and people being against. >> Given that I don't think there is a consensus yet. > >Having automated checks would be great but I see no practical proposal >for how to get those. I'm not even sure it's possible to automate >questions like "should this be translated?" or "are all the licences >clear?".
And no human will find it. Especially not for large applications and our already existing applications. But there are things which can easily be automated: • check whether there is a copying file • check whether all source files have a valid copyright header • check whether Messages.sh exists • run what scripty does The practical proposal is: get a room during Akademy and discuss what can be automated. Put that down on phabricator and let's work together to get it done. If I get a way to verify that KWin has everything properly translated automatically and not two years later in bug reports. We are hackers - I don't accept answers like who is going to implement this. We just do! And yes that implies that I will try to help. Cheers Martin
