Am 2017-07-12 00:20, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
El dimecres, 5 de juliol de 2017, a les 21:37:09 CEST, Martin Flöser va
escriure:
Am 2017-07-04 13:20, schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> The applications lifecycle policy needs an update
>
> Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages?
Hi all,
I'm now going to propose a rather radical change to the process:
3. Remove the 2 week Review process
If we don't have review, at which point do i say:
* Your i18n handling is broken
* Your library installed headers will be a pain to maintain ABI
* etc
Never?
The review process for me is a way to make you realize that things you
didn't
think were important now suddenly are since you want to be a grownup.
Please see my other replies to this thread which also discuss how I
imagine this to work for the translation team.
Of course you can break it again later but I would like to hope that
once told
how to do those things properly it may be easier to keep them doing
right
Right, like KWin where I am the fourth maintainer after review. That's
my whole point: replace the review with automated checks always running.
Cheers
Martin
