Hi Thomas, thanks for this issue forward with a rather constructive approach!
> On 16. Aug 2017, at 03:20, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeif...@kde.org> wrote: > > I have now cleaned up https://notes.kde.org/p/KDE_IM_requirements > <https://notes.kde.org/p/KDE_IM_requirements> by removing > duplicates, removing all discussion / comments (so only plain requirements are > left) and rewording most requirements to that they have a somewhat common > wording. > > The next step will be to turn this into a Kano survey which will be used to > prioritize them (will do that tomorrow). I think this is exactly what is needed. The requirements collected right now are a superset of anything anyone could ever wish for. I am really interested in seeing them prioritised and the bottom 20% of them scrapped :-) Best, Mirko. -- Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V. FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
