Now in the right thread: I actually think I missed two things that would be important to me:
* no logging: it should be possible to have no public logs of a channel * per-channel nicks: to avoid people joining in getting renamed to GuestXXXX On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a > > KDE-wide > > primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys: > > > > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 > > > > The Kano model [1] categorizes features not just in "must have" and "nice > > to > > have" but into five categories along two dimensions. > > This results in a more holistic view on the requirements, at the expense of > > making the survey quite long because participants have to rate each feature > > on > > two dimensions. > > Weird... I would say that "I expect" is much stronger than "I like". > > > > > So, please fill in the survey, but be aware that overall you'll have to > > answer > > a whopping 106 questions (rating 53 requirements on two dimensions each), > > so > > please reserve enough time. > > The survey took me 13 minutes to complete, but of course I've already read > > the > > requirements countless times, so you might need a bit more time. > > > > Thank you in advance for your participation, > > Thomas > > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kano_model > > > > -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.krita.org, http://www.valdyas.org
