On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Eike Hein <[email protected]> wrote: > On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer > <[email protected]> wrote: >>Here are the results of the survey: >>https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ >>Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile! >>Cheers, >>Thomas > > Hi, > > I propose we: > > * Turn the must-have list into a wiki table and create columns for each chat > solution
I've created the table and done a first pass of filling in the IRC information: https://community.kde.org/IM_Survey_Results I had a bit of trouble with Calligra Sheets, and so the first pass of short descriptions is all there is for now. > * In each cell, use > ** ... a red background to indicate a feature is not available, and neither > planned nor likely to happen > ** ... a yellow background if a feature is either not yet widely available or > still in the planning stages, with text (in the cell? footnote?) having to > provide details including timeline of expect ed availability > ** ... a green background if a feature is supported Your wish is my command. It uses the same templates as WIkipedia: {{No}, {{Maybe}}, {{Yes}}. There's also an {{H}} template (as on Wikipedia) that provides a tooltip for longer explanations. If you would like to know more about how to use them, you can check out their documentation. > I can take a stab at the Matrix and maybe IRC v3 columns (especially as the > Konversation UI rewrite and planned Matrix support imho turns some > additionals cells yellow, but even without Konvi-NG I think it's compelling > personally). > > > Cheers, > Eike > -- > Plasma, apps developer > KDE e.V. vice president, treasurer > Seoul, South Korea ~Eli
