On Montag, 27. Juli 2020 09:58:52 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Sonntag, 26. Juli 2020 18:31:08 CEST Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > An even bigger question, I'm afraid. When nobody steps up, what would we > > do? I wouldn't mind "moderating" this list today, for instance, since I > > found the time to read it. But I for one would not *commit* myself to > > moderate it or any other; I just don't have the required availability > > and if I had, I wouldn't guarantee I would remain available. > > I'm sorry, but I have the feeling that you are making too much of a fuss > about > this. Maybe you are misunderstanding what "moderating" entails. Or maybe I > misunderstood for years what moderation of a mailing list entails. > > I am owner of one mailing list and moderator of another. Moderation of the > second mailing list is restricted to the moderation of posts that are held > for > moderation mostly because those post come from unsubscribed senders (99 % of > this is SPAM). I'm not even subscribed to the second mailing list. I don't > see > moderation of legit posts (i.e. posts that are not held for moderation) as my > task. This kind of moderation costs almost no time.
Yep, that hits the nail on the head. I can second that. -- Regards Thomas Baumgart https://www.signal.org/ Signal, the better WhatsApp ------------------------------------------------------------- Computer science terms (#095): PGP-Keysigning-Party The cult of sitting together and collectively mumbling magic numbers. -- Gert Doering -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
