Hi, https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/merge_requests/698
would still benefit from some input on how to proceed in this very concrete case. Greetings Christoph On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 16:56, Christoph Cullmann <christ...@cullmann.io> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:00, Justin Zobel <jus...@1707.io> wrote: > > > On 17/05/2025 01:40, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > just as a concrete example: what to do with > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/merge_requests/698 > > > > > > That is no AI spam but something that doesn't look broken and the > > > submitter did > > > do manual work. > > > > > > Can I now accept that just as MIT? > > > > > > Greetings > > > Christoph > > > > If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of the code that was used > > to generate the code, then it's literally gambling that this code wasn't > > taken from another project by Gemini and used without their permission or > > used in a way that violates the license and opens up the KDE e.V. to > > litigation. > > > > This is an absolutely possible scenario if the author happens to look > > around for their code being re-used. KDE e.V. CAN NOT accept AI > > contributions because the source of the code isn't known. > > > > It really scares me that we would even consider accepting this. I fully > > understand that it is impossible to tell if a user is lying about > > generating code with an AI, but we have to at least remove the KDE e.V. > > from possible harm by rejecting code unless it is sourced from a license > > and privacy respecting model. Which I'm sure there are very few of and the > > ones that exist would have very little code as every single piece of code > > would have to be audited by the owner of the model to ensure that it can be > > distributed and used in their software, and that the owners accepts this. > > > > Of course, this still all boils down to trusting contributors. They can get > > code from anywhere and claim at as their own. AI just makes it much easier > > for them to do it. > > > > Justin > > there is now input about what was put into the model to get the result, now > the question is what to do. > > As one input was an LGPL file and some stuff with MIT, the stuff would be the > LGPL I would assume. > > Naturally the question is what to say about the model itself, but if that > implies that all people are out that use the today > often integrated AI stuff for help, that is not that helpful. > > Greetings > Christoph
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
