On Monday 03 February 2014 11:34:44 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote: > > Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1? > > > > Should I include attica? > > Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also be > added to the list: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
Yes, but see what I wrote in the "Tier status of attica & kwallet" thread: there's some buildsystem work to be done for attica to be a proper framework (making it use ECM, so it can integrate better with the other frameworks and be fully consistent with them, including installing camelcase forwarding headers etc.), which also means moving the qt4 support into a separate branch first. Which brings us to the next topic: who as maintainer should approve this. > Also, since no one stepped up to say if it should be in or out, I'd say it > should be with no declared maintainer until someone claims it. I was under the impression that it had a maintainer, although right now I can't remember if that was Jeremy Whiting or Frederik Gladhorn or someone else. Cc'ing them. Guys, any input? (Note that overall this would lower the future maintainance work on attica's buildsystem, since it will just be maintained together with the other frameworks, by anyone who makes changes to ECM or across all frameworks.) -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
