On Sunday 25 July 2010 16:49:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> So ervin is the only person that reviews things that end up in kdereview
> now? That's news to me.

Find me a precedent of a lib going back into kdereview when it gets an extra 
backend implementation... Realistically we can't use kdereview for such 
things, it's like asking for kdecore to go back to kdereview because of recent 
David's work to plug an alternative implementation for KMimeType*...
 
Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Kde-hardware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel

Reply via email to