On July 26, 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Really makes no sense to go through kdereview in this case, especially as > such backends basically require knowledge of the lib itself, which means > the people which are on this list. kdereview wouldn't buy us much.
also remember that a solid backend is: * not exposed publicly, making changes to it trivial later (even removal) * does not do i18n * does not require user documentation together with what Kevin said, that eliminates all of the reasons for putting something through kdereview, imo. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
