On Monday 26 July 2010 09:49:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > I'm not asking the lib going back into kdereview, i'm asking the backend > going through kdereview.
OK, I guess the point you're missing is that they're not plugins. So that's effectively the whole lib you'd need to review such a backend (just like kdecore/auth/backends for instance). Really makes no sense to go through kdereview in this case, especially as such backends basically require knowledge of the lib itself, which means the people which are on this list. kdereview wouldn't buy us much. Don't take me wrong, kdereview is great in the general case, but for a corner case like this one I'm not keen on generating bureaucracy work for the sake of it. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
