On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Eike Hein <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/29/2009 09:07 PM, Ian Monroe wrote: >> I don't think its a blocker though. I do see it as mildly annoying to >> have to ping a sysadmin with a git hash and version number every time >> you want to tag. However I don't really see it a social disruption of >> our meritocratic order though. :) > > Slippery slope and such :/. Of course nobody has ill > intentions here, but once you close a door it's much > harder to open again, due to inertia etc. And then > the culture subtly changes before you know it. So I > feel it's pretty important on some level.
Nah I really think the job of tagging will be yet another administrative function of sysadmin and won't create a centralization of who gets to decide when to tag. Obviously extragear folks decide when to tag themselves; 'slippery slope' doesn't really apply, and I always find that analogy to be very unuseful anyways. Also I don't really see if it as something that should block a release. Its not a big deal if the git hash that is going to be tagged isn't actually tagged for a couple of days (which is the worst case). Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
