On 11/29/2009 11:01 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Diumenge, 29 de novembre de 2009, Eike Hein va escriure: >> On 11/29/2009 10:34 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>> My with i18n dude hat on i've rejected some gitorious hosted projects to >>> start using our git-i18n infraestructure on the grounds that it was only >>> available to Amarok because git kde transition is in test mode. >> >> Hm, why exactly, though? > > Because there's a full list of things hosted somewhere that need to be done > until we declare git to be KDE ready.
Are you sure you're not mixing up the KDE SC and things outside it, though? I think individual teams should be able to to decide for themselves whether they value git higher than some of the boni exclusive to the SVN repos at the moment -- unless them being in git causes extra work e.g. for kde-i18n, which is why I asked, and which you didn't really answer. Unless us being in git causes trouble for you - which we don't want it to - why would you veto it on behalf of kde-i18n? FWIW, Konvi I think is in pretty good shape. We've been at 0 on Krazy2 for most of the last couple of years, in part because we have local krazy installations and run it before comitting larger bits. So the fact that the EBN currently doesn't cover Gitorious wouldn't affect us in this regard, for example. So I don't really see why testing the waters should be exclusive to Amarok. Again, do you intend to block the Gitorious move of KOffice for now as well? > Albert -- Best regards, Eike Hein _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
