On 11/29/2009 11:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> So I don't really see why testing the waters should be >> exclusive to Amarok. > > Because that is what was decided.
I'm not really sure what to make of this, tbh. It's in stark contrast to the general "you should get going with git, too!" vibe on IRC and the blogs promoted by the Amarokers. They seem to be really happy they made the switch, and we at Konvi don't see any additional needs we have over Amarok. Yes, Gitorious isn't perfect yet - that's why I started this thread, I think the tagging situation really needs a fix - but using git would make it worth putting up with that for us. The way I see it, any additional team that makes the leap and switches over is only going to increase momentum of the whole transition, which should help with the work on the list that led to that decision you cite. Preventing eager people from switching to git won't make switching to git happen any faster. There's little motivation to work on the list without concrete need/benefit, and if moving to git doesn't cause anybody trouble regardless of the list, then why the hell not allow people to switch and increase momentum. > I don't intend to block anything, the list of things to do is blocking the > move not me. Not really. You started things out with "if you move to git you're going to lose i18n because I won't edit some files and add some lines". I'd ask you to please reconsi- der. > Albert -- Best regards, Eike Hein _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
