On 11/29/2009 10:32 PM, Ian Monroe wrote: > Nah I really think the job of tagging will be yet another > administrative function of sysadmin and won't create a centralization > of who gets to decide when to tag. Obviously extragear folks decide > when to tag themselves; 'slippery slope' doesn't really apply, and I > always find that analogy to be very unuseful anyways. > > Also I don't really see if it as something that should block a > release. Its not a big deal if the git hash that is going to be tagged > isn't actually tagged for a couple of days (which is the worst case).
FWIW, we're not in "this is an absolute deal-breaker" mode about this, but we were kind of hoping for a con- sensus that is something that should be on the "is a bug, needs to be fixed eventually" list. I mean, aft- er all we seem to agree that it would in principle be better to find away to avoid having to involve sysad- min to do something as day-to-day as creating a tag. How does the conduit to communicate our needs to the Gitorious developers work right now? Could we put this into that conduit? > Ian -- Best regards, Eike Hein _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
