> No, the Kepler license is not the same the MIT license. > Specifically, the Kepler license added: " Kepler is not in the public > domain and the Kepler Project keep its copyright." > Which is the cause for all of my questions.
That's not a part of the license - just an explanation. There is, however, a copyright notice which is the legal equivalent of that sentence. The MIT license is usually combined with a copyright notice. One of the requirements that the MIT license imposes is in fact that this copyright notice is preserved. The same is true for BSD, GPL, and pretty much any other commonly used free software license. - yuri _______________________________________________ Kepler-Project mailing list Kepler-Project@lists.luaforge.net http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kepler-project http://www.keplerproject.org/
