Agreed, 1.0.1
--
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> IMO we should go for the 1.0.1 release since the previous 1.0.0 major release
> had passed some time. The minor release did fix some important bugs and we
> should suggest users use this minor release instead.
>
> Are there any critical issues we want to target for the minor release?
>
> Kerby users/committers, any comment? Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Kerby new minor release
>
> Hi all,
>
> After Kerby 1.0.0 released, 12 issues were resolved, including following bug
> fix and improvement:
> Fix the issue not compatible with MIT Kerberos:
> DIRKRB-614<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-614>,
> DIRKRB-631<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-631>;
> Fix the network related issue:
> DIRKRB-629<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-629>;
> And with some improvements in token preauth and kinit;
>
> I suggest we can make the new minor release. How do you think about it?
>
> Thanks,
> Jiajia
>
>
>
