Ah, great, missed that.
On 08/28/2017 07:47 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Thanks Stefan. There is a JIRA to track it here already:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-647
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kerby folks,
>>
>> just in case you are not subscribed to [email protected] (you should
>> subscribe), the Kerby Jenkins jobs [1][]2 fail for some weeks now. Cause
>> is a compilation failure, KeyTab.getPrincipal() was only added in JDK8
>> but the build still is configured to use JDK7.
>>
>> So either
>> * Change the code if you want to keep Java 7 compatibiliy for 1.0.x
>> * Change Jenkins job and source/target level in pom.xml to Java 8
>>
>> Your call :)
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Directory/job/dir-kerby/
>> [2] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Directory/job/
>> dir-kerby-openjdk/
>>
>> On 08/28/2017 11:15 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>> Yes, let's get 1.0.1 done. Will I take care of calling the vote, or does
>>> someone else want to do it?
>>>
>>> Colm.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Gerard Gagliano <[email protected]
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed, 1.0.1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>> On Aug 17, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO we should go for the 1.0.1 release since the previous 1.0.0 major
>>>> release had passed some time. The minor release did fix some important
>> bugs
>>>> and we should suggest users use this minor release instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any critical issues we want to target for the minor release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kerby users/committers, any comment? Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Kai
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:32 AM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Kerby new minor release
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> After Kerby 1.0.0 released, 12 issues were resolved, including
>> following
>>>> bug fix and improvement:
>>>>> Fix the issue not compatible with MIT Kerberos: DIRKRB-614<
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-614>, DIRKRB-631<
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-631>;
>>>>> Fix the network related issue: DIRKRB-629<https://issues.
>>>> apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-629>;
>>>>> And with some improvements in token preauth and kinit;
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest we can make the new minor release. How do you think about it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jiajia
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
