Hi Colm, It's great if you could take this work. Thanks, Jiajia
-----Original Message----- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0.1 release Yes, let's get 1.0.1 done. Will I take care of calling the vote, or does someone else want to do it? Colm. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Gerard Gagliano <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, 1.0.1 > > -- > > On Aug 17, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > IMO we should go for the 1.0.1 release since the previous 1.0.0 > > major > release had passed some time. The minor release did fix some important > bugs and we should suggest users use this minor release instead. > > > > Are there any critical issues we want to target for the minor release? > > > > Kerby users/committers, any comment? Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:32 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Kerby new minor release > > > > Hi all, > > > > After Kerby 1.0.0 released, 12 issues were resolved, including > > following > bug fix and improvement: > > Fix the issue not compatible with MIT Kerberos: DIRKRB-614< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-614>, DIRKRB-631< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-631>; > > Fix the network related issue: DIRKRB-629<https://issues. > apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-629>; > > And with some improvements in token preauth and kinit; > > > > I suggest we can make the new minor release. How do you think about it? > > > > Thanks, > > Jiajia > > > > > > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
