Hi Kerby folks,

just in case you are not subscribed to [email protected] (you should
subscribe), the Kerby Jenkins jobs [1][]2 fail for some weeks now. Cause
is a compilation failure, KeyTab.getPrincipal() was only added in JDK8
but the build still is configured to use JDK7.

So either
* Change the code if you want to keep Java 7 compatibiliy for 1.0.x
* Change Jenkins job and source/target level in pom.xml to Java 8

Your call :)

Kind Regards,
Stefan

[1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Directory/job/dir-kerby/
[2] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Directory/job/dir-kerby-openjdk/

On 08/28/2017 11:15 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Yes, let's get 1.0.1 done. Will I take care of calling the vote, or does
> someone else want to do it?
> 
> Colm.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Gerard Gagliano <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Agreed, 1.0.1
>>
>> --
>>> On Aug 17, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO we should go for the 1.0.1 release since the previous 1.0.0 major
>> release had passed some time. The minor release did fix some important bugs
>> and we should suggest users use this minor release instead.
>>>
>>> Are there any critical issues we want to target for the minor release?
>>>
>>> Kerby users/committers, any comment? Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:32 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Kerby new minor release
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After Kerby 1.0.0 released, 12 issues were resolved, including following
>> bug fix and improvement:
>>> Fix the issue not compatible with MIT Kerberos: DIRKRB-614<
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-614>, DIRKRB-631<
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-631>;
>>> Fix the network related issue: DIRKRB-629<https://issues.
>> apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-629>;
>>> And with some improvements in token preauth and kinit;
>>>
>>> I suggest we can make the new minor release. How do you think about it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jiajia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to