Hi JP, Can you point me to some of the clearance violation issues?
I’m aware of the one where a track that goes within the thermal clearance radius can produce a DRC error, but I’d consider that what DRC is for. But it sounds like there are others? Thanks, Jeff. > On 22 Jun 2019, at 18:58, jp charras <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 22/06/2019 à 18:37, Jeff Young a écrit : >> New, higher-performance bits in, with some (perhaps all) of the bugs fixed. >> >> Testing would be appreciated. >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff. >> > > Hi Jeff, > > Usually, when 2 bugs are fixed, one new bug is created. > > Thermal stubs are missing for pads having a different size in X and Y > direction. > They are missing for the biggest direction. > > Apart from that: > * The calculation time is bigger than the current algo, but no longer > blocking (for instance 2 sec instead of less than 1 sec in a bad case). > * Much more annoying, the thermal stubs can create DRC issues: > They do not always respect the zone clearance, and in some cases do not > respect the netclass clearance. > > They also create some shape artifacts. > They are of course not the same as the current algo, but they exist. > > -- > Jean-Pierre CHARRAS > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
