Euleuh ieu mah disebutna salah alamat. Apal kuring ge nu mana halimun nu mana 
kang aschev. Tadi mah nulis teh nurutan kang halimun nu sagala kudu dibuktikeun.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 26, 2010, at 18:13, Aschev Schuraschev <[email protected]> wrote:

> Beu, naha kuring disebut ki halimun? Bener-bener tukang fitnah yeuh saderek 
> Ilen teh. Paluruh IP addressna samemeh ngomong!
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 11/26/10, Ilen Kardani <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: Ilen Kardani <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [kisunda] Inohong - Pamanggih Stepen Hawking ngeunaan Pangeran
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 4:50 AM
> 
>  
> Sugan teh kang halimun bakal nanya, "naon buktina yen Pangeran nu nyiptakeun 
> makhluk? "Ari ukur katulis tina buku mah teu bisa cukup jadi bukti pan? 
> Kumaha lamun nu nulis bukuna salah?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 14:27, Aschev Schuraschev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Saha nu nyiptakeun mahluk? Jalma-jalma nu ariman mah pasti ngaku yen 
>> Pangeran nu nyiptakeun mahluk (kaasup alam jagat raya katut hukum alamna). 
>> Hawking jelas pisan percaya yen jagat raya diatur ku hukum alam.
>> 
>> Lamun ditanya "saha nu nyiptakeun hukum alam?" Sanajan atheis, Hawking oge 
>> masih mangmang, manehna teu bisa ngajawab kalayan pasti. Tapi manehna boga 
>> anggapan yen hukum alam kasebut mungkin diparentah ku Pangeran ngan Pangeran 
>> henteu ngalakukeun intervensi pikeun ngeureunkeun 
>> (ngareksak/ngarempak/ngamusnahkeun) hukum alam kasebut.
>> 
>> Nya heueuh atuh. Pan dina Islam diajarkeun yen Pangeran boga sifat 
>> "berkehendak". Nepi ka iraha wae Pangeran bade ngahirupkeun eta hukum alam, 
>> eta mah urusan Mantenna. Iraha Pangeran bade ngancurkeun hukum alam 
>> (intervensi kana hukum alam), eta oge urusan mantenna. Kabeneran wae ayeuna 
>> urang aya dina mangsa Pangeran masih ngahirupkeun hukum alam. 
>> 
>> 
>> Religious views
>> 
>> Throughout his early work, Hawking used the word "God" in metaphorical 
>> meanings but also suggested the existence of God was unnecessary to explain 
>> the origin of the universe, as discussed in A Brief History of Time.[53] 
>> However, his newest book The Grand Design, as well as interviews with the 
>> Telegraph and the Channel 4 documentary Genius of Britain, clarify that he 
>> does "not believe in a personal God."[54] Hawking writes, "The question is: 
>> is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, 
>> or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second." Hawking 
>> adds, "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will 
>> create itself from nothing." Graham Farmello of the Telegraph writes, "God 
>> did not create the universe, Stephen Hawking revealed."[55][56]
>> 
>> His ex-wife, Jane said during their divorce proceedings that he was an 
>> atheist.[57][58] Hawking has stated that he is "not religious in the normal 
>> sense" and he believes that "the universe is governed by the laws of 
>> science. The laws may have been decreed by God, but God does not intervene 
>> to break the laws."[59] 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Kirim email ke