Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology by Max
Jammer, (Princeton: Princeton press, 1999 hdb, pbk
2002 ) pages 279 cloth bound $37.50 and paperback
$16,95 

Reviewed by Sarojini Henry 

"To me it suffices to wonder at these secrets and to
attempt humbly to grasp with my mind a mere image of
the lofty structures of all that there is". These are
the words with which Albert Einstein concluded a
statement of his philosophy of life made in 1932.
Einstein's insatiable curiosity about the secrets of
the world can be traced to his fascination with a toy
compass, which his father gave him to play with when
he was a child. The effect the compass had on young
Albert was both prophetic and dramatic. The question
for Albert was how the little needle, enclosed in a
box, should have the constant impulse to point to the
north. 

Banesh Hoffmann, who calls Einstein a creator and
rebel, rightly summarizes Einstein's philosophy in the
following words, "The essence of Einstein's profundity
lay in his simplicity and the essence of his science
lay in his artistry-his phenomenal sense of beauty."
Einstein had indeed captured the world's imagination
with his exceptional blend of a profound aesthetic
sense, an insatiable curiosity about the secrets of
the universe and a rare ability to grasp mentally the
structure of all there is. What Einstein accomplished
in his life in the scientific field was a truly an
astonishing achievement for any human being. Apart
from his scientific ingenuity, his acute sensibility
to social problems and peace concerns has become part
of the legacy of the world's most renowned scientist. 

But what was Einstein's attitude to religion? Not many
biographies of Einstein say much about Einstein's
philosophy of religion although his quest for
spiritual truth had played a prominent part both in
his personal life and in his scientific research.
Often, Einstein's ideas about religion have been
distorted both by atheists and by religious groups
eager to claim him as one of their own. In this
context, this fascinating book, Einstein and Religion:
Physics and Theology, by Max Jammer, the distinguished
Professor of Physics Emeritus and former Rector at
Bar-Ilan University in Israel, provides us with a
clear, well-documented and an unbiased picture of
Einstein's religious sensibilities and his philosophy
of religion. 

Max Jammer, like Einstein himself, comes in the long
line of Jewish scientists, of the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries, Jacques Loeb in physiology,
Minkowski in Mathematics, Paul Ehrenfest in the
quantum theory, Haber in chemistry, Leo Szilard in
nuclear physics all bearing witness to the spectacular
part that Jewish scholarship had played in the field
of science, often displaying exemplary courage in the
face of anti-Semitism Thus Max Jammer was not only at
home with the theoretical part of Einstein's physics
but also shared his cultural background. Further,
Jammer knew Einstein personally and this acquaintance
enabled him to draw on a wide range of less familiar
anecdotes in Einstein's life and thought. 

The book has three chapters; the first chapter
examines the role of religion in Einstein's personal
life and includes some biographical notes. The second
chapter deals with Einstein's philosophy of religion,
both from Einstein's writings and also from the
interviews that religious leaders had with Einstein.
The third chapter analyses the effect of Einstein's
physics on theology, although Einstein himself
abstained from using the word theology. 

The first chapter begins with a discussion of
Einstein's childhood religious education and the
religious atmosphere--or its absence--among his family
and friends. It then reconstructs, step by step, the
development that led young Albert from the religious
paradise of his youth to the stage when, "through the
reading of popular scientific books", he "reached the
conviction that much of the stories in the bible could
not be true." Such a posture seemed to have motivated
Einstein to find God in the physical world itself,
from the atomic level to the stellar level; and
Einstein attests that this road beckoned him like a
liberation and since then has proved itself
trustworthy. 

Max Jammer goes on to explain how Einstein's religious
sentiments were closely allied to that of Spinoza.
Baruch Spinoza, a seventeenth Jewish philosopher, was
the author of a rigorously monistic interpretation of
reality, and Einstein had read Spinoza'a Ethics while
working at the Berne office. When Rabbi Herbert
Goldstein of the Institutional Synagogue in New York
called Einstein in 1929 to ask whether he believed in
God, Einstein cabled a reply, "I believe in Spinoza's
God, who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of
what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with
the fates and actions of human beings" 

Einstein was influenced by Spinoza's belief in
determinism in which all events in nature occur
according to immutable laws of cause and effect.
Einstein also believed like, Spinoza, that some
superior intelligence reveals itself in the harmony of
the universe. Then again, like Spinoza, Einstein
regarded the idea of a personal God as an
anthropomorphism. For Einstein there is no personal
God, but held that there is "a spirit is manifest in
the laws of the Universe- a spirit vastly superior to
that of man, and one in the face of which we with our
modest powers must feel humble" . Further, Einstein
believed that the laws of nature though complex can be
understood by the human person and hence Einstein
could assert "Subtle is the Lord, but malicious he is
not." 

In the second chapter, Jammer explores Einstein's
writings and lectures on religion and its role in
society, and how far they have been accepted by the
general public and by professional theologians like
Dean R. Fowler, Paul Tillich or Frederick Pond Ferr�.
Einstein not only gave lectures on the theme of
religion and science but also responded to many
queries addressed to him by several clergy and rabbis.
Further, Einstein was also interviewed by several
religious peoples and other scholars including the
Indian poet Rabindranath Tagore. 

Jammer gives a vivid account of Einstein's meeting
with Rabindranath Tagore in his home at Caputh in the
summer of 1930. Tagore the Nobel Laureate for
literature in 1913 and Einstein both shared a love of
music and of nature. The discussion turned to truth
and beauty and to the question whether they are
independent of the human person. When Tagore denied
that truth or beauty is independent of the human
person, Einstein asked Tagore "If there would be no
human beings anymore, the Apollo of Belvedere would no
longer be beautiful?" When Tagore replied "No",
Einstein answered "I agree with regard to this
conception of Beauty but not with respect to Truth."
Einstein's point was that scientific truth must be
conceived as a truth independent of reality. When
Tagore claimed," If there be some truth which has no
sensuous or rational relation to the human mind, it
will ever remain as nothing so long as we remain human
beings." Einstein seems to have replied triumphantly,
"Then I am more religious than you are." 

One of Einstein's articles published and preserved is
Religion and Science which occupied the entire front
page of the New York Times of November 9, 1930.
"Everything that men do or think", it began, "concerns
the satisfaction of the needs they feel or the escape
from pain." Einstein then continued, to outline three
stages of religious development, starting with the
religion of fear that moved primitive people to
envisage supernatural beings. This stage gave rise to
the moral religion which arises from the "desire for
guidance, love and support". This leads to the "God of
Providence who protects, disposes, and rewards."
Einstein pointed out that the Christian Scriptures is
an admirable illustration of the transition from the
religion of fear to the religion of morality. 

Then comes the third stage of religious experience
which Einstein called the cosmic religious feeling,
which, recognized neither dogma nor God made in the
image of man. Einstein pointed out that the Psalms and
some prophetic books display aspects of the cosmic
religion. Further, Einstein was sure that any person
who is thoroughly convinced of the rationality of the
universe will have no use for the religion of fear or
for moral religion. Einstein then reaffirmed his
belief that the cosmic religious experience is the
strongest and noblest driving force behind scientific
research and added that in our largely materialistic
age, the serious scientific workers are the only
profoundly religious people. 

Einstein's cosmic religion was based on the view that
the cosmos is governed by strictly deterministic laws.
Einstein could not accept the probabilistic
interpretation of the quantum theory because of his
deep conviction in the rationality of the universe. In
his view, the statistical laws necessary to explain
the subatomic world, can only compel God to throw the
dice in each case. He wrote to Max Born in Dec, 1926
"Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner
voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The
theory says a lot but does not really bring us any
closer to the secret of the Old One. I, at any rate,
am convinced that He does not throw dice." 

After moving to the United States, Einstein was
invited to give a lecture at a conference at Princeton
Theological Seminary in 1939. Einstein titled his talk
'The Goal' and concluded that scientific thinking
alone cannot lead to the ultimate and fundamental
purpose of our existence. Again in 1940 at a
'Conference on Science Philosophy and Religion', held
at the Union Theological Seminary in New York,
Einstein presented a paper on 'Science and religion'.
In addition to his famous statement "science without
religion is lame and religion without science is
blind", Einstein also claimed a certain independence
of science and religion by asserting that "science can
only ascertain what is, but not what should be,"
whereas "religion on the other hand, deals with the
evaluations of human thought and action." 

It was Einstein's denial of a personal God that
elicited stern criticism from American clergy. In
Einstein's strict determinism, God cannot be personal
capable of responding to people's prayers and
performing acts on his own volition. God, in
Einstein's view does not concern himself with human
actions so that for Einstein, morality has nothing to
do with religion. Einstein believed that God is devoid
of ethical properties, and that morality and the
concept of good and evil are all relative to human
values and norms. He did not see that a future life
was essential for ethical behaviour in this life. 

The last chapter of Jammer's book deals with the
important question, whether Einstein's scientific
work, and in particular his theory of relativity, has
theologically significant implications. Such a problem
is important for those who are interested in the new
discipline of the relation between science and
religion and it is already an established fact that
Einstein's theory of Relativity has altered
irreversibly the philosophical discussions of the
nature of time and space. 

The new cosmology, based on Einstein's general theory
of relativity, is raising some deep philosophical
issues and is producing direct and indirect statements
concerning the nature of time and space and of the
universe and the ultimate reality with significant
implications for theology. It looks as though
contemporary science of Einstein has taken on the
roles that once belonged exclusively to metaphysics
and as a consequence is having direct impact on
theology and philosophy. Contemporary physicists are
engaging in the question of the effect of physics in
theology, to the extent that they seek to go beyond
the mere data of the universe and address the
fundamental metaphysical questions about the origin,
purpose, and ultimate destiny of the universe. 

Jammer also points to process philosophy developed by
Alfred North Whitehead in consistent with the new
physics in which nature is understood as evolutionary,
dynamic and emergent and where the emphasis is on
becoming rather than being. The implication of this
philosophy for theology is worked out by Charles
Hartshorne, according to whom God is immanent with the
world just as the world is immanent with God, although
God and the world do not form an identity. 

In Jammer's view, Einstein's cosmic religion is
incompatible with the doctrines of the Christian and
Jewish religions. The point of contention is the idea
of a personal God. The general impression from the
several interviews and Einstein's response to queries
from individuals and groups, is that most Christian
clergy opposed Einstein's stand while Jewish rabbis
approved it. The question is how one understands the
concept of a personal of God. Paul Tillich, then
professor of systematic theology at Union Theological
Seminary, was sympathetic to Einstein's view, in
pointing out that the notion of a personal God is only
a symbol, though a necessary one. Max Jammer rightly
concludes that "Tillich's statement converges towards
Einstein's cosmic religion as much as is possible for
a theistic theologian." 





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give the gift of life to a sick child. 
Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's 'Thanks & Giving.'
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lGEjbB/6WnJAA/E2hLAA/.DlolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

______________________________________________________________________
http://www.numesir.org untuk informasi tentang Cabang Istimewa NU Mesir dan 
KMNU2000, atau info-info seputar Cairo dan Timur Tengah.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kami berharap Anda selalu bersama kami, tapi jika karena suatu hal Anda harus 
meninggalkan forum ini silakan kirim email ke: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kmnu2000/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke