https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36350
--- Comment #33 from David Gustafsson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michał from comment #27) > I'm somewhat curious, could you benchmark before applying the patch but with > MariaDB query cache enabled to see how it compares against the two other > benchmark results? > > > I understand this uses Koha::Cache::Memory::Lite, is it theoretically > > possible to use Memcached ? > > I don't think it's a good idea, it could flood the memcached storage > severely and potentially be not much faster if not slower than just > retrieval with SQL, plus longer-term preservation of cache in this manner > could lead to way more issues/risks, such as someone updating the database > externally or with some maintenance script. The database query itself constitutes only a tiny fraction of the overhaed, like less than a few percent at most, query cache or not, it's the DBIx magic that is the major problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
