begin  quoting Lan Barnes as of Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:00:52PM -0800:
[snip]
> There are many languages (forth, tcl.tk) that have a preternatural
> ability to make a certain kind of knotty problem dissolve into
> simplicity. This is why I try to avoid language wars (some are too much
> fun to stay out of altogether). I think the smart money decides what
> type of programming problem s/he has fun attacking and then selects
> languages to learn accordingly.

I'm with Lan (and Andrew) on this.

Some languages make the solution to some problems trivial and/or obvious.

No language makes all problems trivial and/or obvious.

Any sufficiently powerful programming language is equivalent to any other
programming, given enough effort.  Note that this equivalence is not in
real-world performance terms, nor in programmer efficiency terms, but
mere that it can arrive at the same answer.

You can write a compiler in COBOL, f'r instance. The only reason to do
so would be to demonstrate that yes, it can be done.

-Stewart "The third problem you should tackle in a lisp is mergesort" Stremler
-- 

KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to