-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2005 08:19 pm, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: > >>Come to the BSD side, my son ... > > > * No software RAID
Does it even have a journalled fs? I won't go without one anymore. It doesn't have reiser either which is my favorite. It's missing a lot of commercial support if you ever want to run a commercial application on it. No SE Linux or other style mandatory access control is there? I think it has SMP now although probably not as mature as Linux's SMP since it has been around so much longer. We gave up BSD in the very early days of MP3 in large part due to lack of SMP support. Less driver support also. More people are familiar with Linux if you are looking for employees. BSD is cool and all but I don't see a whole lot of reasons to run it other than for religious or nostalgic reasons. I am glad it exists though just in case something really bad happens to Linux although I can't really conceive of what that would be that would not affect BSD also. > *BSD does have that advantage; the kernel and userland "are BSD." Not > kernel this and libc that and coreutils something else. What other OS does glibc and coreutils run on if not Linux? - -- Tracy R Reed http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCQUGk9PIYKZYVAq0RAqu0AKCQ9tF5orxyWwbGkKxn6WH9Sk4HkQCfeaDw UCO0Ezy6UJHN/Hmix9xDQCk= =adaP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
