Richard Reynolds said:
>> There
>> are no more technical considerations.  I mean, what more do people
>> want??  What does Windows do that Linux doesn't???
>
> ok so you asked for it, most are application or dystro issues, but
> some
> aren't and Im not talking about running windows IN linux to get these
> to
> work but as many just work in windows, figured its a place to start.
>
> *it would be nice if linux really worked with more than 1 of my 10
> printers
> ( 2 of which there is no excuse for lack of support)

Ask the printer manufactuerers why their printers aren't supported.
Did you check http://www.linuxprinting.org ? If the manufacturers
refuse to provide hardware information to Linux developers it's not
the fault of Linux it's the fault of the manufacturer.

> *it would be nice if it supported w/o hacking all of the features of
> my
> laptop .... (though not a HUGE deal)

It supports all the features of my laptop. Your is obviously not an
IBM. I check hardware support before buying it. For years I would not
buy any adaptec scsi cards, and I told them so, because they refused
to provide the programmers the information to support their hardware.
Eventually the got the message and now Adaptec is well supported. I
don't by any hardware if the manufacturer refuses do provide either
Linux drivers or information that the programmers can use to write the
drivers. I vote with my pocketbook for Linux.

> *a presentation software package (like powerpoint) that worked !!!

I haven't used it personally but I understand OpenOffice has a work
alike for PowerPoint.

> lets face
> it when im at work trying to run one on linux and its not doing what I
> want,
> I look bad! or if one of the other people in the room says "hey why
> didnt
> you do" ... "like I did in powerpoint" again I look bad!
> * it would be nice if i could handle excel and access files better,

I've opened, modified and saved changes to Excel spreadsheets in Open
Office, so I know that works! Technically though, it's not Linux, as
Open Office also has a version for Windows, that I have tested. And it
works on Excell spread sheets just fine.

Access is a database, not a very good one, but a database nonetheless.
We have a ton of different databases that work in Linux. We don't have
access for Linux.

> again I
> cant say to my clients "sorry I dont run M$", and most dont understand
> that
> either excel is the wrong tool for the job or that access isnt a tool
> :D

I tell my clients all the time, I don't run Windows. The send me word
attachments, Excel attachments never PowerPoint. I deal with all of
them in Linux just fine. I do warn them about sending me html email.
My spam filters usually put them into my spam mailbox, which will
delay my response. But I can deal with them fine too.

> * full support for my scanner (though really its close ....)

I have only owned one scanner, and I gave it away before ever trying
to make it work, so I can't respond to that.

> * better video editing would be nice

There must be some video editing software for Linux since most of the
movie studios use Linux for doing preproduction work these days. I
don't do it, so I can't get any more specific than that. But, I do
know there is high quality video editing software for Linux.

> * REAL data recovery software (all the good packages are m$ dos and or
> M$
> windows based) and on that I wouldnt mind shelling out $,$$$ but it
> had
> better work the first time just like the packages that run in/on M$
> do.

I'm not sure what data recovery software your talking about. If you
delete a file in Linux it's deleted. If you're talking about backup
and recovery software, there is a large selection of Open Source and
commercial software available for Linux and those that I've run and
tested work well.

> * email  though in reality I dont like the M$ versions either I end up
> using
> 3, OE (using now, on laptop) outlook and pine, and using all 3 is
> getting
> can we say OLD!!!

You have a ton of choices in Linux for how you read and respond to
email. I'm using a web based email client right now, because it's the
way I track the responsiveness of a service I provide to clients. I've
used Pine and mutt, I've looked at others, some I liked, some I
didn't. Outlook is one of the worse email clients I've ever had the
misfortune to look at, but many people depend upon it for their daily
correspondence. I run my own, and on occasion, clients mail servers
and they are all highly reliable. More than I can say for Exchange.

> * a FAST simple image viewer like acdsee, though in reality i have not
> tried
> out any in the last 6 months or so .... so they could have gotten
> better

Tracy already mentioned display. I'm somewhat partial to XV. It does a
lot of nice things that display doesn't do for me. If I want to
manipulate images I'm likely to use either Gimp or XV, depending upon
how I want to manipulate the image.

> * and though this is more of a dystro and ME problem, it would be nice
> if I
> could get rid of all of the server/multi user stuff. granted I like it
> on a
> few machines, but back to my laptop the only user is ME, if I am going
> to do
> something stupid im gona do it with or without having to type su - to
> do
> so!!!

Maybe you should try Xandros. It's a very "Microsoft" like interface,
suitable for people who are more comfortable with Microsoft Windows
than X-windows. I installed it on a machine for my grandaughter,
(she's 12) and she had absolutely no problem using it.

>  a note from experience
> * a good FlightSim would be nice, and full support for 2 monitors and
> my
> joystick/flightstick whichamacallit  (in the flightsim)

Perhaps we need to do a presentation on Linux for Windows users. There
seem to be a lot of misperceptions about what you can and can't do
with Linux that still persist.

-- 
Neil Schneider                              pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
                                           http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B  8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
Secrecy, being an instrument of conspiracy, ought never to be the
system of a regular government.
- Jeremy Bentham, jurist and philosopher (1748-1832)


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to