Outlook is ugly. We use it here at work, and frequently when we have to upgrade (because of new computers) things don't import right, the user loses months of email because the new Outlook and the older outlook don't import pst files, you have to archive it or back it up to get it to work right. I'd much rather fuss over an X config file anyday over upgrading/downgrading Outlook.
On 11/1/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Neil Schneider wrote: > > > > I was reinstalling Windows on a system that had gotten so out of wack > > that it required a reinstall to fix it. I carefully saved all the data > > files to the (SAMBA) fileserver and dumped Outlook data into a .pst > > file. After the reinstall I went to import the .pst file and it > > wouldn't read it. It turns out that the computer had Office 2003 > > originally installed and the customer gave me Office 2000 to > > reinstall. Why in the world would Microsoft change the file format for > > Outlook from one to the next version? Oh, that's right, it's a > > marketing decision, not a technical decision. > > Ever try putting your xfree86-4 config file in place for an xfree86-3 > server? Did that work well? > > -john > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > -- Gossamer Axe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
