Tracy R Reed wrote:
I think I might go down to the hardware store tomorrow and buy some of that flexible plastic dryer vent hose to attach to the computer and then hang out the window. But how to attach it to the back of the case? Hmm...just had an idea: I could get one of those metal fittings that go on the inside of the wall that the dryer hose attaches to, drill four holes in it, and put the bolts that hold the fan in place through it and then through the case and the fan. Yep, a run to the hardware store is definitely in order. I'll let you know how it goes.

Please, take pictures. This I *have* to see. :)

An ingenious idea, really. One thing you might want to consider is that adding ducting increases backpressure. You might want to add a 120 mm fan on the output side to help the air along. You should also consider filtering the input air into the computer. It'll fill up with dust fast. But that's regardless if you duct to the outside or not :)

As far as current meters go, if you don't want to put something inline you're stuck with the "amp clamp." However, this requires you to strip the insulation back off a power cable and clamp the device around just the hot (black/brown) lead -- that will tell you how much power is going in. For posterity purposes, you should also check the neutral (white/blue) line and make sure the current in on hot is the same as the current going out on neutral. If it's different, clamp it around the ground (green/yellow). If you have current sinking to ground that's an indication of a serious electrical condition in one of your pieces of equipment. But I digress! Really, the best way to measure this is with an inline device. Once upon a time I bought a few analog panel-mount ammeters at the local electronics store, bought a 2U quarter-depth rack chassis, cut some holes in the front and back, then mounted the meters. I had a NEMA L14-20P on the input side, and a pair of NEMA L5-20R on the output side, which fed a couple PDUs. This, at a glance, would tell me how much current I was draining on either leg of the 240, and how balanced the load was (perfectly balanced 240 should have 0A drained from either leg to neutral). It ended up being a really sexy project. I wish I still had that device. I still have the schematics if you're interested.

The heat thing you described is just about dead-on. Energy is never wasted, so all the power dissipated by the machine goes out as either heat or light. Since the amount of power it takes to create light is negligible (*) we can safely say that all the power coming in is dissipated as heat. Thus, for each amp drained, each 120W dissipated, you're generating 409.68 BTU/hr of heat. Most modern computer systems dissipate between 200 and 400W of power dependent on configuration and usage. So, for each computer assume you're generating 1024.2 BTU/hr (that's a median 300W load). Also keep in mind that things like routers, switches, cable modems, monitors, etc. also dissipate power as heat and their usage must also be taken into account. Your typical 20" CRT dissipates between 120 and 145W of heat. Your typical DFP dissipates 35W. Add the aggregate power consumption (W) of your devices together, multiply by 3.414, and you get BTU/hr. In a residential setting you want to size your air conditioner grossly above that number for a couple reasons: a) when it's running you're paying dearly for it so you don't want it running all the time b) larger units are more power-efficient c) you want the unit to still be able to cool the room when you're in it or in the case you leave the door open. To put this in perspective, the typical room AC you can get for $100 at home depot will cool the room 5000 BTU/hr. Also, as air conditioning has the wonderful property of drying out the air, you might want to consider an evaporative humidifier (with automatic hygrometer) to keep the humidity at a constant 35% to prevent the buildup of static electricity. Static bad. The humidifier will also assist in cooling (you get the "swamp cooler" effect).

(*) in the case of incandescent light bulbs, 99.999% of the energy used is dissipated as heat. Fluorescent lights are much more efficient, as only 99.99% of their energy is dissipated as heat. :)

Hope your project goes well.

-Kelsey


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to